Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hubungan Luar Negeri

Date Log

Submitted
June 18, 2024
Accepted
July 1, 2024
Published
June 30, 2024

Civil Society’s Dual Role in Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Benefits and Risks

https://doi.org/10.70836/jh.v9i1.50
Naldo Helmys
Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Multilateral, Kementerian Luar Negeri RI, Indonesia
Yurisa Irawan
Government Studies Department, Indonesia Open University, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Naldo Helmys

naldo.helmys@kemlu.go.id

JURNAL HUBUNGAN LUAR NEGERI, Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hubungan Luar Negeri

Abstract

This paper examines the role of civil society as an instrument of foreign policy, exploring its potential benefits and risks. Traditionally, foreign policy analysis focused on decision-making processes and the primacy of the state. However, the end of the Cold War, the rise of post-positivist approaches, and the increasing interconnectedness of global issues have led to a broader consideration of policy instruments, including the involvement of non-state actors like civil society. The study employs a comparative approach to analyze the benefits of civil society in promoting democracy and addressing global challenges against the risks of biased utilization and dependency on state support. It examines case studies, including the role of USAID in Myanmar and the Israel-Palestine conflict, as well as the Indonesian context, where the government engages civil society in development and foreign policy. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach that leverages civil society’s strengths while mitigating its risks as an instrument of foreign policy.

Keywords

civil society foreign policy democracy donor bias
Civil Society’s Dual Role in Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Benefits and Risks. (2024). JURNAL HUBUNGAN LUAR NEGERI, 9(1), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.70836/jh.v9i1.50
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. ALLMEP. 2020. “Congress Advances Historic Fund for Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding.†2020. https://www.allmep.org/news/congress-advances-historic-fund-for-israeli-palestinian-peacebuilding/.
  2. â€â€Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã¢â‚¬â€. 2024. “ALLMEP - Who We Are.†2024. https://www.allmep.org/about-us-allmep/.
  3. Barnes, Catherine. 2006. “Agents for Change: Civil Society Roles in Preventing War & Building Peace.†Den Haag.
  4. Bawana, Tate Agape. 2021. “Civil Society Endorsement on Democratization: A Lesson from Myanmar.†Journal Transformative 8 (1): 128–45.
  5. Ben-Eliezer, Uri. 2015. “The Civil Society, the Uncivil Society, and the Difficulty Israel Has Making Peace with the Palestinians.†Journal of Civil Society 11 (2): 170–86.
  6. Breuning, Marijke. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Brouwer, Imco. 2000. “Weak Democracy and Civil Society Promotion: The Cases of Egypt and Palestine.†In Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion, edited by Marina Ottaway and Thomas Carothers, 21–48. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  8. Callahan, Mary. 2012. “The Generals Loosen Their Grip.†Journal of Democracy 23 (4): 120–31.
  9. Carlsnaes, Walter. 2013. “Foreign Policy.†In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 2nd ed., 298–325. London: Sage Publications.
  10. Carothers, Thomas. 2006. “The Backlash against Democracy Promotion.†Foreign Policy 85 (2): 55–68.
  11. Chandler, David. 2004. Constructing Global Civil Society: Morality and Power in International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Edwards, Michael. 2004. Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Ehrenberg, John. 1999. Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea. New York: New York University Press.
  14. Finkel, Steven E., Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2007. “The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990-2003.†World Politics 59 (3): 404–38.
  15. Hawthorne, Amy. 2004. “Middle Eastern Democracy: Is Civil Society the Answer?†Democracy and Rule of Law Project 44: 3–24.
  16. Hudson, Valerie M. 2005. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.†Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1): 1–30.
  17. International Crisis Group. 2001. “Myanmar: The Role of Civil Society.†Bangkok.
  18. Jamal, Amal. 2018. “The Rise of ‘Bad Civil Society’ in Israel: Nationalist Civil Society Organizations and the Politics of Delegitimization.†Stiftung Wissenschaft Und Politik, no. 2.
  19. Kaldor, Mary. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
  21. Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.†The American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–93.
  22. Meyerstein, Avi. 2008. “Middle East Peace Group Meets in DC.†Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, 72.
  23. Mietzner, Marcus, and Edward Aspinall. 2010. “Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: An Overview.†In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, edited by Edward Aspinall and Marcus Mietzner, 1–20. Singapore: ISEAS.
  24. MOFA Indonesia. 2019. Pernyataan Pers Tahunan Menteri Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia Retno L.P. Marsudi Tahun 2019. Jakarta.
  25. â€â€Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã¢â‚¬â€. 2020. “13th Bali Democracy Forum: Democracy in Managing Global Pandemic,†December 10, 2020. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/en/read/1967/berita/13th-bali-democracy-forum-democracy-in-managing-global-pandemic.
  26. â€â€Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã¢â‚¬â€. 2021. “Bedah Buku Diplomasi Membumi, Dubes Djumala: ‘Menulis Adalah Cara Sederhana Memaknai Sejarah,’†July 9, 2021. https://kemlu.go.id/vienna/id/news/14498/bedah-buku-diplomasi-membumi-dubes-djumala-menulis-adalah-cara-sederhana-memaknai-sejarah.
  27. â€â€Ã¢â‚¬â€Ã¢â‚¬â€. 2023. “BCSMF 2023: Progressive Dialogue to Strengthen Democracy in the Asia-Pacific,†November 29, 2023. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/en/read/5557/berita/bcsmf-2023-progressive-dialogue-to-strengthen-democracy-in-the-asia-pacific.
  28. Morgan, T. Clifton, and Valerie L. Schwebach. 1995. “Economic Sanctions as an Instrument of Foreign Policy: The Role of Domestic Politics.†Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 21 (3): 247–63.
  29. Olsen, Gorm Rye. 2000. “Promotion of Democracy as a Foreign Policy Instrument of ‘Europe’: Limits to International Idealism.†Democratization 7 (2): 142–67.
  30. Pemerintah RI. 2020. Lampiran Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024. Jakarta.
  31. Ramsbotham, Oliver, Hugh Miall, and Tom Woodhouse. 2011. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  32. Roy, Sara. 2011. Hamas and Civil Society in Gaza: Engaging the Islamist Social Sector. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  33. Scholte, Jan Aart. 2011. “Global Governance, Accountability and Civil Society.†In Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance, edited by Jan Aart Scholte, 8–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Schultz, Kenneth. 2013. “Domestic Politics and International Relations.†In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 2nd ed., 478–502. London: Sage Publications.
  35. Sfeir-Younis, Alfredo. 2004. “The Role of Civil Society in Foreign Policy: A New Conceptual Framework.†Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 5 (2): 29–32.
  36. Spini, Debora. 2011. “Civil Society and the Democratisation of Global Public Space.†In Civil Society and International Governance: The Role of Non-State Actors in Global and Regional Regulatory Frameworks, edited by David Armstrong, Valeria Bello, Julie Gilson, and Debora Spini, 15–30. London: Routledge.
  37. The Guardian. 2013. “Burmese Snap up First Private Newspapers in 50 Years,†April 1, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/01/burmese-private-newspapers.
  38. USAID. 2012. “USAID Assistance to Burma from 2008 - 2012.â€Â
  39. Walker, Christopher. 1987. “The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of ‘Soft Power.’†The Journal of Strategic Studies 27 (1): 237–59.
  40. Wardlaw, Grant. 1987. “Terror as an Instrument of Foreign Policy.†Journal of Strategic Studies 10 (4): 237–59.
  41. Zevi, Bruno B. 1946. “Town Planning as an Instrument of American Foreign Policy.†Journal of the Americans Institute of Planners 1: 34–39.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.

How to Cite

Civil Society’s Dual Role in Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Benefits and Risks. (2024). JURNAL HUBUNGAN LUAR NEGERI, 9(1), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.70836/jh.v9i1.50
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 473 Download : 766

Most read articles by the same author(s)